Hermione,
I never did get a chance to speak with you after we made the galleons the other night. I suppose we all got a bit side-tracked by other things.
Anyway. It's not terribly important, I don't think. Only you once spoke about knowing someone else who's a natural occlumens, and I had a question about them. Not about who they are, just about their ability. Is that something you can say more about or should I not ask?
From,
Hydra
I never did get a chance to speak with you after we made the galleons the other night. I suppose we all got a bit side-tracked by other things.
Anyway. It's not terribly important, I don't think. Only you once spoke about knowing someone else who's a natural occlumens, and I had a question about them. Not about who they are, just about their ability. Is that something you can say more about or should I not ask?
From,
Hydra
no subject
2012-11-26 15:35 (UTC)What did you want to know? I can see what I can find out.
no subject
2012-11-26 15:43 (UTC)That's all.
Also, if you could not tell the others I'm asking about these things, I'd be grateful.
From,
Hydra
no subject
2012-11-26 16:05 (UTC)But as to how it relates to legilimency, that's loads harder and it usually can't be learned by anyone who doesn't already have a predisposition towards it, and there's a spell people use when they're learning occlumency, but I've heard that it's really imprecise and it's not at all the same as someone actually using the innate skill. I think that almost all Legilimens are also Occlumens, if that helps. (And that would be one of those what-do-you-call-its, oh, I'll have to look that up! It's driving me mad.)
Well, anyway, like I said, almost all Legilimens are also Occlumens, but being an Occlumens doesn't necessarily mean that one's also able to practise legilimency. I think legilimency is something most of them have to work at, but
UNIVERSAL SYLLOGISM!
Sorry. That's the term I was trying to think of before. I think.
Er, well, I'll have to ask, but for example, I know of three people who can do Occlumency, or something like it, and only one of them is also a Legilimens. I think that person learned it deliberately, it didn't suddenly happen. I could find out more, though, if you like.
Are you sure about not telling the others? Because I know Sally-Anne's interested and I'm sure it would be useful for everyone, really, and I can bring it up in a way that doesn't make it obvious you're the one who's asking. Why, are you interested in learning but don't want anyone to know about it?
no subject
2012-11-26 16:14 (UTC)I mean, really, I could ask her to find out about these things but you can see why I'd rather not, I'm sure.
Because that's just it, I don't want to learn. If there's only a way to make sure that I never do. I don't want it to just...happen. Accidentally, I mean.
From,
Hydra
no subject
2012-11-26 16:19 (UTC)Okay, well, let me ask and I'll let you know?
You can also learn how not to do it when you don't want to do, that much I do know.
no subject
2012-11-26 16:22 (UTC)From,
Hydra
no subject
2012-11-26 20:34 (UTC)Actually, I bet if
youthe person meditated and worked on Occlumency, that would stop it pretty effectively, but there's no guarantees, supposedly.Does that help?
no subject
2012-11-26 20:51 (UTC)And if you think on what they're like, you can see why no one would want to work with them.
Actually, if they're representative of what people who have both abilities are like, then I've definitely got to make sure that I never, ever get legilimency. Not that I have got it - just that someone recently accused me of trying to use it on him, when of course I wasn't. But he knows what Mummy can do, and he knows I can do occlumency, so now he's assuming the absolute worst, you see.
From,
Hydra
no subject
2012-11-26 21:00 (UTC)And I think you're assigning too much about their personalities to their ability with it. I know at least one person who can do it who isn't like that at all. Maybe even two, although I wouldn't say I'm friends with them, you know, just that I know them and they're nice. Well, sort of nice, anyway.
I mean, I do see your point because someone who can just reach in and read someone else's thoughts might tend to think it's their right to do so, or that it's justified because it's in a good cause, or something like that. But not everyone who can read minds has to be a--a berk about it.
no subject
2012-11-26 22:00 (UTC)I don't think I'm assigning too much. You don't think it's a little frightening, that one of the most powerful people in England, along with the most powerful, can do both of those things? And who's to say if having the skills didn't make them the way they are. Imagine being able to see what people really thought about you, and from a young age, especially. People aren't very generous in the privacy their own minds, after all. I know I'm not always.
From,
Hydra
no subject
2012-11-26 22:09 (UTC)Because sometimes seeing what people really think is a good thing, isn't it? If it helps you be a better person, that is, but not if it's just going to make you bitter or nastier, but that's down to the sort of person you want to be.
I think if you're a good person, you can be convinced of bad things, but you're still basically a good person. If you're a selfish or nasty person, then bad things become an excuse to be even nastier.
But then, I don't know, because I think about how long Sirius has been trying to convince people what the right thing is to do, and how many of them go on not doing it.
So I'm not sure, I suppose.